For growing FinTechs, risk technology will be a must to appease tougher regulators
In striving for growth, many FinTech firms enter different markets with solutions that use the same underlying technology. As highlighted by recent AML-related issues, however, this technology is seldom regulation-friendly. To withstand deeper inbound regulatory scrutiny, FinTechs must adopt robust risk technology.

Last year was a
Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now
Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.
New to Chartis Research? View our subscription options
If you already have an account, please sign in here.
More on Regulators
Complacent RiskTech vendors are sleepwalking into a new, deregulated reality
Tectonic regulatory and legislative upheaval promises to transform financial institutions’ RiskTech spending. As compliance-based revenue streams slow due to deregulation, solution vendors will need to adopt more business risk-focused strategies for their product lines. Chartis Chief Researcher Sid Dash considers the likely impact of growing deregulation, and how vendors can prepare.
Regulatory reporting: deployment options and managed services
A collaborative article by Chartis and Regnology.
RiskTech100 2025 Winner’s Spotlight: Regnology
Regnology has secured the award for Regulatory Reporting in Banking, earned top honors in Supervisory Technology and ranked 22nd overall.
A New Regime: The Future of Private Credit and Risk Management Needs
A collaborative article by Chartis and RiskSpan.
Regulatory reporting: the transition from in-house to third-party systems
A collaborative article by Chartis and Regnology.
Biometrics: assessing the opportunities and risks as regulations loom
Biometric technology can enhance fraud and anti-money laundering processes, but can carry big risks. As it becomes more widespread, financial firms and tech vendors must develop the security and governance frameworks to realize its potential – before regulators force them to.
Reinsurers’ IFRS 17 struggles are a reminder that one size does not fit all
The IASB issued IFRS 17 in a bid to standardize insurance contract accounting, but reinsurance firms, because of their particular idiosyncrasies, will struggle to comply. Unless the IASB makes significant modifications to the standard, reinsurers everywhere will have to reassess the nature of their life insurance contracts.
You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Chartis account, please register for an account.
Sign in