Regulators need a robust taxonomy of tools before tackling AI
Regulating AI is a challenge that must and will be faced. Central to effective regulation will be a robust, accurate taxonomy of the multiplicity of available AI techniques.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@chartis-research.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@chartis-research.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@chartis-research.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@chartis-research.com
More on Points of View
EMS vendors must eliminate transaction fees and make multi-broker, multi-asset trading easier
Execution management systems (EMSs) profess to be multi-broker and multi-asset, yet traders are still juggling multiple EMSs on their desktops. There is a threshold effect at work, whereby EMSs’ penalizing transaction fees and workflow inefficiencies…